Online Consumer Complaint Site

Company Complaints

Opinions, advice, statements, offers, or other information or content made available through the complaint site ShamScam are those of their respective authors and not of ShamScam, and should not necessarily be relied upon. Such authors are solely responsible for the accuracy of such content. ShamScam does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information on ShamScam and neither adopts nor endorses nor is responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any opinion, advice or statement made. Under no circumstances will ShamScam be responsible for any loss or damage resulting from anyone's reliance on information or other content posted on ShamScam.

  ● AboutFile A ComplaintMy Company Is Listed!ScamsTerms

 

Susan Detomi

Navigation: Main page

 Print this complaint 

Author: Anonymous

AND NOW, THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2006, SUSAN DETOMI AND STEVE DETOMI, PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE MANDATORY PRE-TRIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED IN THE ABOVE MATTER ON MARCH 3, 2006, AT 10:00 AM, A RULE TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON SAID COUNSEL IS HEREBY ISSUED. RULE RETURNABLE THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 2006, AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 696, CITY HALL, PHILADELPHIA, PA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DIRECTED THAT ALL COUNSEL MUST ATTEND. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THIS RULE HEARING WILL RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS, INCLUDING PRECLUSION OR DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE....BY THE COURT: JUDGE PAUL P. PANEPINTO

 

 

Site owners not responsible for the information posted on website.